Thursday, December 1, 2011

Final Materials and Presentation

Final Materials:

Content Mapping Document - Document showing the mapping of current materials to the proposed information architecture
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10129194/Final%20Materials/Content%20Mapping.xlsx



Design Decision Matrix - Document showing the project goals, what major design decision we made and support sources for those design decisions.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10129194/Final%20Materials/Design%20Decision%20Matrix.xlsx



Site Diagram - Document outline proposed site organization and cotent alignment.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10129194/Final%20Materials/site%20diagram%20v3.pdf



Prototype
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10129194/Final%20Materials/Archive.zip




Final Presentation:


Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Working Prototype (v1)

To use the prototype -

1) download the zip file from the link below

2) uncompress the zip file - leave files in the structure that they uncompress to.

3) click default.htm file to start the prototype


http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10129194/working%20prototype.zip

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Mid-Term Presentation



Contents include:
1) Goals
2) Personas
3) Site Diagram
4) Wireframes
5) Initial Visualization


Select More to view in full screen.

Visualization of Site Design


Thursday, October 20, 2011

Thursday, October 13, 2011

User Research Conclusion Summation


Conclusions Drawn From User Research Interviews: 

People that would be interested in this product in the first place are easily convinced by the extraordinary health benefits. The growing popularity and nutritional notoriety of green tea beverages provides credibility to claims about the leaves from which they are derived. Attitudes formed about green tea leaves do not appear to be unrelated or dissimilar to previously held attitudes toward green tea. The appealing aspects of the beverage are successful selling points for the leaves.  
However, there seem to be two variables that must be understood in the target audience: green tea and health knowledge and inclination toward healthy lifestyles. (See diagram below)
Those with high levels of knowledge about the benefits of green tea and healthful consumption are likely to be already sold on the product. Motivation to even begin to act is the only issue for this group.  Those with high inclination toward healthy lifestyles are highly motivated to act. Their barrier to act seems to be ease of object access and task completion, but mostly it seems to be knowledge about green tea. The amount of knowledge sufficient enough for those with high inclination to pursue a healthy lifestyle is minimal. That is, a few words about its great benefits from a friend is enough to generate action.




Certain barriers to action (site visitation, site exploration, purchase of product) were identified in the interviews. Two expressions of doubt of the website’s credibility came from a.) aesthetics and b.) the singular product available. The aesthetics concern  was given a contingency- the interviewee said it would not prevent him from pursuing the acquisition of green tea leaves. The interviewee whom expressed concern with the product availability would prefer a two-sided refutation message. In accordance with the research done by O’Keefe (1999) and Allen (1998), a message that both enhances the credibility/superiority of the product being offered as well as providing cogent reasons why others are not as good is more likely to influence attitudes. The interviewee was informed that the products available were tested alongside others, but the interviewee preferred the superiority of the product over others (and an opportunity to compare) be more obvious.
Interviewee consistently expressed a liking for the large amount of information and the recipes provided. Another well-received aspect of the site is the very accessible and highly pertinent subpage titles.  To summarize general pleasure with the architecture on first look, on interviewer said, “I like how everything I need is right here up at the top. I don’t have to look for what I need.”
           


Allen, M. (1998). Comparing the persuasive effectiveness of one and two sided messages. In M. Allen & R.W. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advance through metaanalysis (pp. 87-98). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press

O’Keefe, D.J. (1999). How to handle opposing arguments in persuasive messages: A meta-analytic review of the effects of one-sided and two-sided messages. In M.E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 22, 209-249